Why Are Service Providers Slow to Adopt Crop Sensors for Nitrogen Management?

Recently, we have seen important discussions about key aspects of precision agriculture. One of these articles, about the value in variable rate nutrition, explains how there is no easy recipe or universal method to do it successfully, even more so when talking about variable rate application of nitrogen. The dynamics of nitrogen in soil and crop response to nitrogen fertilizers is quite complex, varying from place to place and year to year, making it a challenge to apply the optimum rate.

In another article, the author raises general questions about some missing pieces in precision agriculture. Among the questions, there is a discussion about how complex the prescriptions for variable rate application should be. Simple prescriptions, based only on soil testing, for example, are cheaper to implement and easy to understand, but may not account for important factors related to crop response to fertilizers. Recommendations that are more complex will need more knowledge of the area and some local calibration of algorithms.

For nitrogen, time is also very important. Ideally, topdressing applications should consider in-season data to better account for temporal variability, and for that, we need a workflow of data collection, data processing, decision making, and application usually within one week. Scientists have been developing remote sensing tools to make this feasible. Active crop canopy sensors, usually known as NDVI sensors, are the state-of-the-art remote sensing technologies. These sensors have been available for some time, mostly focused on real-time variable rate application of nitrogen. However, there is still low adoption of this technology by farmers. This raises an important question: if conventional methods are not good enough to make variable rate prescriptions for nitrogen application, why haven’t service providers and farmers adopted crop canopy sensors as a better alternative?

A recent paper published in Field Crops Research journal by Colaço and Bramley provides some insights to answer this question. The paper is a review on the use of crop sensors to improve nitrogen management in grain crops. Overall, the studies using crop sensors to guide variable rate nitrogen reported fertilizer savings of 5%-45% with little effect on grain yield. Economical evaluations reported impacts on profit usually ranging between losses of US$ 30 ha−1 and profits of US$ 70 ha−1, with an average profit of US$ 30 ha−1. The lack of consistent evidence of economic benefits is one factor that limits adoption by farmers. About 25% of studies reported economic losses from sensor-based nitrogen applications, but there are some concerns with the methodology used that may explain the results. The following paragraphs include a summary of the authors’ comments plus some personal opinions.

The strategies for using the sensors are divided in two groups: real-time prescription based on sensor values and a local reference; and real-time redistribution based on sensor values and a pre-defined average rate. In the first one, the concept of reference strips is used to determine the deficit of nitrogen in plants that received a normal rate of nitrogen when compared to plants that received nitrogen fertilizer in abundance. In this group, the algorithm includes two variables, the adjustment of the average rate as a function of crop response in that specific place and conditions, and the variable rate application according to field spatial variability.

The second concept is simpler to implement by using a virtual reference concept, which is obtained as the sensor performs readings in the area. Despite the advantage of not needing the N-Rich reference strips, this strategy assumes that the planned average rate is optimum, and only redistributes the fertilizer in the field. In both scenarios of using crop sensors, the shape of the algorithm used to convert sensor values into prescription rates depends on crop type, development stage, and assumptions of underlining limiting factors. All of this will influence the results obtained with variable rates.

What is observed in many studies is that the greatest gains in the use of sensors have come from the better estimate of the average optimum rate, rather than from the variable rate itself. In this scenario, the use of other tools like predictive models of crop response based on historical data and weather forecasts can enhance the chances of success.

Real-time-VRA-cotton
Real-time variable rate application of topdress nitrogen fertilizer in cotton and the vegetation index variability map obtained by crop canopy sensors.

Regarding the limitations in methodologies used, most experiments are carried out in small plots, which makes it difficult to evaluate the effects of spatial variability. The allocation of reference strips within the field is also a problem because field variability must be considered. Better results can be obtained using on-farm-trials and management zones, so that reference strips can be replicated in strategic locations, using rates close to the optimum recommended by modeling tools rather than very high rates as sometimes used in N-Rich strips.

One thing that sometimes seems to be forgotten is that the ROI of using variable rate technology is strictly related to the magnitude of spatial variability. There is still no widely used precision agriculture opportunity index to compare how variable are the experimental fields used. Most researchers fail to describe and consider this. In relatively homogeneous fields the improvement of nitrogen management using crop sensors can be expected to be much less important than applying the optimum average rate. In fields with large variations, nitrogen may not be the more important yield limiting factor, therefore the use of a single algorithm is unlikely to provide good results.

In conclusion, there is still a lot to be learned about nitrogen management in each situation and this is an area of research that can be improved by new technologies such as big data and machine learning. It is evident that more data including historical information and multiple sensors, coupled with complex models, are needed to describe crop response to nitrogen application. Moreover, this needs to be simple to use, otherwise the technology will not be adopted.

Leave a Reply

One comment on “Why Are Service Providers Slow to Adopt Crop Sensors for Nitrogen Management?

Sensors/IoT Stories
Sentera-Gimbaled-Quad-Sensor
Sensors/IoTSentera Gimbaled Quad Sensor Optimizes Crop Health Data Capture
August 7, 2018
Sentera’s Quad sensor is now available in an integrated gimbal-stabilized package for DJI Inspire and Matrice drones. Featuring four fully-customizable Read More
Bergwerff-in-field-weather-stations-and-Ranch-Systems-radio-control-module
Industry NewsRanch Systems, IoT Provider Aeris Announce Collaboration Agreement
July 25, 2018
Aeris, a technology provider in the Internet of Things (IoT) space, said today it is collaborating with Ranch Systems of Read More
Farmer-Tablet
Data ManagementAgriculture’s Next Breakthrough: New Technologies Are Driving Efficiency, Data Insights
July 3, 2018
We live in an exciting time in agriculture. Not only is technology advancing rapidly, but the understanding and comprehension of Read More
JDandPessl
Sensors/IoTJohn Deere, Pessl Instruments Team Up to Create Opportunities
June 18, 2018
John Deere is best known for its line of tractors, combines, sprayers, and implements. However, in an effort to help Read More
Trending Articles
1 On 1 With Paul Schrimpf: Simplot’s Allan Fetters
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One With Simplot’s Allan Fetters
August 8, 2018
Allan Fetters of PrecisionAg Institute partner Simplot Grower Solutions talks about techology trends and key learnings from the recent InfoAg Conference in this exclusive interview with PrecisionAg's Paul Schrimpf. Read More
PrecisionAg InstitutePrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper Library
August 1, 2018
Welcome to the PrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper library! Here you will find free whitepapers and case studies from the PrecisionAg Institute Partners Read More
AmericasIntegrity Ag Group: People Over Precision
July 30, 2018
It’s not every day that this reporter walks into the office of a precision ag dealer, sits across from the Read More
farmer-tractor-tablet
Systems ManagementWhat is Digital Farming — Really?
July 24, 2018
The agricultural community has spent several years synthesizing an operational description for digital farming. In several cases, there have also Read More
Data ManagementInfoAg News: Farmobile Launches DataEngine, Streamlines DataStore Buyer Process
July 17, 2018
Busy times these days out in Leawood, KS, for ag data startup Farmobile, as they continue to – pardon the Read More
ISPA-Yoshua-Bengio
EventsHighlights from the 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture
July 9, 2018
The 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (ICPA) presented by the International Society of Precision Agriculture (ISPA) was held in Montreal, Read More
Latest News
Wheelman-Pro
Industry NewsAgJunction Expands Automatic Steering Market to Smaller…
August 14, 2018
AgJunction, the autosteering company, has introduced Wheelman, a new way for farmers to automatically and accurately steer farm equipment at Read More
Drip-irrigation
Precision IrrigationFertigation as a Precision Agriculture Tool
August 14, 2018
Fertigation is a fertilizer application method in which dissolved fertilizers are delivered to the crop through the irrigation system. This Read More
Events5 Reasons You Should Attend Growing Innovations
August 13, 2018
The specialty crop market is wracked by unprecedented change: labor scarcity, water shortages, pressing demands for increased quality and transparency Read More
Data Science tablet
Data ManagementMicrosoft, Agile Networks Detail Central Ohio Broadband…
August 9, 2018
Agile Networks, a leading provider of telecommunications solutions, and Microsoft Corp. has announced a new agreement to bring broadband internet Read More
AmericasIvy Tech Opens Center of Excellence to Train Tomorrow&#…
August 9, 2018
Students interested in careers in precision agriculture equipment technology or diesel technology now have the opportunity to pursue certificates, technical Read More
1 On 1 With Paul Schrimpf: Simplot’s Allan Fetters
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One With Simplot’s Allan Fetters
August 8, 2018
Allan Fetters of PrecisionAg Institute partner Simplot Grower Solutions talks about techology trends and key learnings from the recent InfoAg Conference in this exclusive interview with PrecisionAg's Paul Schrimpf. Read More
Corn field sunset
Industry NewsTrimble RTX Correction Technology Now Delivers Two Cent…
August 7, 2018
Trimble has announced that its Trimble RTX GNSS corrections technology can now achieve horizontal accuracies of better than two centimeters. Read More
Sentera-Gimbaled-Quad-Sensor
Sensors/IoTSentera Gimbaled Quad Sensor Optimizes Crop Health Data…
August 7, 2018
Sentera’s Quad sensor is now available in an integrated gimbal-stabilized package for DJI Inspire and Matrice drones. Featuring four fully-customizable Read More
BigDataSmall2
Data ManagementPrecision Agriculture: A Smaller Approach to Big Data
August 7, 2018
Big data is one of the most buzzed-about concepts in our industry. Rarely do we read a newsletter, attend a Read More
Grower-Retailer
Industry NewsAgworld, K-coe Isom Form Strategic Partnership
August 6, 2018
Agworld and K-coe Isom have announced a strategic partnership that will see them integrating business advisory and technology to deliver Read More
Industry NewsAgEagle Acquires Agribotix
August 6, 2018
AgEagle Aerial Systems has signed an agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Agribotix, a Boulder, CO-based drone-enabled Read More
Digital-Farming
Systems ManagementImplementing Digital Farming’s Five Major Needs
August 2, 2018
Building a house starts with a plan and then a foundation; it does not start with doors and windows. From Read More
PrecisionAg InstitutePrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper Library
August 1, 2018
Welcome to the PrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper library! Here you will find free whitepapers and case studies from the PrecisionAg Institute Partners Read More
Bruce-Erickson-video
Excellence AwardsPassion for Teaching: Purdue’s Bruce Erickson
August 1, 2018
PrecisionAg Award of Excellence recipient Bruce Erickson is driven to share his knowledge of precision technologies and techniques with students, as well as the larger agriculture community. Read More
Newell-Kitchen
Excellence AwardsChasing the Mystery Behind Soil Variability: Newell Kit…
August 1, 2018
Newell Kitchen of the University of Missouri, recipient of the Legacy award in the 2018 PrecisionAg Award of Excellence program, has worked for decades to employ technology in unlocking the secrets hidden in farm fields. Read More
Nish-Majarian-video
Excellence AwardsNishan Majarian: Keeping Software Simple
August 1, 2018
Addressing the grower's true needs and making software easy to use has driven Agrian's product development from the beginning says co-founder and CEO Nishan Majarian, recipient of the 2018 Crop Adviser/Entrepreneur Award in the PrecisionAg Awards of Excellence program Read More
Rodney-Wright-video
Excellence AwardsRodney Wright: Better Farming With Precision
August 1, 2018
Harnessing the power of precision technology leads to year-over-year improvement in productivity and stewardship, says Arkansas grower Rodney Wright, recipient of the 2018 Farmer award in the PrecisionAg Awards of Excellence program. Read More
Rod Weimer and Paul Schrimpf
Australia/New ZealandPast Recipients Of The PrecisionAg Awards Of Excellence
July 31, 2018
Since 2007, the PrecisionAg Insititute has sponsored the annual Awards of Excellence program. Here's a list of the past winners. Read More