Choosing Precision Agriculture Technologies

With the end of winter in sight, many in the agricultural industry are starting to get serious on their choices of precision agriculture technologies for the upcoming growing season. Whether the choice is equipment, software, or just taking soil samples in a new pattern, a lot of thought — accompanied with a lot of anxiety — precedes the actual decision. This decision is commonly made without an appreciation of the value expectations on the part of the user (e.g., grower, consultant, rep) and the hidden costs on the part of the provider of the technologies. In this article, I wish to discuss how the precision agriculture “ante” for making a choice is much greater than the purchase price — with some important implications for an organization. I have added some visuals to help elucidate my arguments.

The precision agriculture ante can be best understood with the interplay of two curves: perceived or demonstrated value of new technology to improve production (technology value) vs. user cost, and the necessary user education of the new technology (user education) vs. seller cost. I have assumed in my arguments that the seller will initially bear the cost of educating a user on a new technology. As a technology becomes mature, third-party vendors may provide another educational option. I will first discuss each curve and then discuss the interplay between them. A graph of the technology value (in terms of improved production) versus user cost curve is in Figure 1 , while a graph of the user education versus seller cost is in Figure 2.

The technology value vs. user cost curve in Figure 1 is the classic “diminishing return” curve. There is a diminishing return in the production value for each successive investment in new technology (dotted lines in figure). Viewed another way, you get the biggest bang for your buck on your first purchase of a new technology with lesser returns on future purchases relative to the improvement in production (e.g., higher yields, more efficiency).

The user education versus seller curve in Figure 2 has the inverse relationship to the “diminishing return” curve in Figure 1. There is an increasing return in the education of the user of a new technology for each successive investment in training (dotted lines in figure). In other words, a user can more quickly grasp new technologies after getting an initial grounding with the first technology. However, the increase in user education comes at an increasing cost to the seller. Now, with an understanding of what each curve means alone, we combine them to get greater insight into the precision agriculture ante.

The Education Equation

The interplay of the curves reveals the age-old struggle between introducing a new technology to a user and at the same time providing adequate education to support that technology. In the best case for both the user and seller, the introduced technology is simple to use (little education at little cost to seller) and has been proven to have high value towards improving production (high value at little cost to user). Since the best case rarely happens, we can explore other more likely scenarios, the extreme of which are dreaded by both the user and seller alike.

The first more likely scenario is that the user needs more education and support to use the new technology (more training at more cost to seller), but there is a demonstrated value of improved production after adapting the technology (high value at little cost to user). The result is that the seller is frustrated (because of additional training costs) even though there is delivery on the technology.

The second more likely scenario is that the user sees little value in the new technology even after receiving adequate education from seller. The result of this second scenario is the user is frustrated (because of diminishing return in value of the new technology relative to earlier technologies) even though there is delivery on the technology. The most dreaded interplay of the curves is when the user fails to see the value of the new technology in production and the seller keeps spending on the education of the user to adapt the technology. In this worst case, both the user and seller are frustrated and there is no delivery on the technology (at least as perceived by the user).

The best and worst cases for the interplay of curves have far reaching implications for an organization. In the best case of high value to user with little education cost to seller, both the user and seller end up on a positive note. The user sees the value that precision agriculture brings to its organization and will be favorably disposed to try new technologies in the future. Furthermore, the same user will be more patient if there is the need for more education with a new technology since the value of the first technology has been established. The seller needs, however, to be aware that the user may see a diminishing return on the next technologies relative to the success of the first and therefore must adjust marketing goals accordingly.

In the worst case of low or no value to user with ongoing education costs to seller, both the user and seller immediately start off on a negative note. The user rejects the technology and with it all future innovations in precision agriculture, while the seller goes out of business. In this worst case, the organization of the user very likely will become less competitive with its neighbors as the new technologies bring benefits to them. The “gun shy” user organization and the failed seller company represent a setback to all of precision agriculture.

The take-home message of the “curves” is that both the user and seller must be aware of the value of a new technology relative to previously adapted technologies and set expectations accordingly. Both the user and seller must be aware of the true educational needs of the user when introducing a new technology. Without this awareness, the ante for technology adoption may be so high that neither the user nor the seller will want to gamble on precision agriculture.

Editor’s note: This article first appeared in the Spring 2007 issue of PrecisionAg Special Reports.

Leave a Reply

Systems Management Stories
Hurricane-Florence-Map-featured-image
Data ManagementMythbusting: Is Weather More Unpredictable Due to a Changing Climate?
October 16, 2018
There are some commonly spoken narratives that are actually false, at least as stated in the exact words used, that Read More
Pix4Dfields_usecase_prunes_farm
DronesEnhance Your Agriculture Workflow in Less Than 30 Minutes
October 15, 2018
Prunes are European plums with a high sugar content that allows them to dry without fermenting around the pit and Read More
Spray Drift
Decision Support SoftwareHow Technology Can Help You Prevent Spray Drift
October 8, 2018
Spray drift. News articles about damage caused by spray drift seem to pop up regularly, almost as daily reminders, during Read More
Aquaoso
Decision Support SoftwareNew Software Monitors Water Risk for California Agriculture
September 28, 2018
AQUAOSO Technologies PBC, a software company that helps customers identify, understand, and monitor water supply risks has officially unveiled their Read More
Trending Articles
Mike-Gomes
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Mike Gomes, Topcon
October 15, 2018
Mike Gomes of Topcon Precision Agriculture joins Paul Schrimpf, Group Editor of PrecisionAg Professional magazine, for a discussion of key Read More
PrecisionAg InstitutePrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper Library
October 1, 2018
Welcome to the PrecisionAg Institute Whitepaper library! Here you will find free whitepapers and case studies from the PrecisionAg Institute Partners Read More
Sensors
Sensors/IoTThe Answer to Agriculture’s Daunting Challenges – Soil Sensors
September 20, 2018
According to the United Nations, 9.6 billion people will live on planet Earth by 2050. Feeding these mouths will require Read More
Soil-Hand
Data ManagementAre You Using Your Soil to Its Full Potential?
September 14, 2018
Harvest is progressing across most parts of the U.S. and those growers who aren’t already harvesting are gearing up to Read More
Grower-Retailer
Imagery/SensingAgtech: 10 Things I Hate About You!
September 4, 2018
Before you get bent out of shape from the title, remember if you’ve read my articles before you know I Read More
Kansas State University
Industry NewsKansas State University, Topcon Form Precision Ag Research Partnership
August 30, 2018
Kansas State University and Topcon Agriculture are collaborating to develop tools and systems to advance precision agriculture and support farmers. Read More
Latest News
rivkaGarcia_FarmsToIncubators_1kpx
Events‘From Farms to Incubators’ Documentary High…
October 18, 2018
“From Farms to Incubators: Telling the stories of minority women entrepreneurs in agtech in the Salinas Valley and beyond” will Read More
ConceptsInAction
Service ProvidersPutting Agronomic Advice Into Action – A Full-Season Fi…
October 17, 2018
It’s one thing to read, write, or know about helping customers best manage their fields – it’s another to put Read More
Hurricane-Florence-Map-featured-image
Data ManagementMythbusting: Is Weather More Unpredictable Due to a Cha…
October 16, 2018
There are some commonly spoken narratives that are actually false, at least as stated in the exact words used, that Read More
Pix4Dfields_usecase_prunes_farm
DronesEnhance Your Agriculture Workflow in Less Than 30 Minut…
October 15, 2018
Prunes are European plums with a high sugar content that allows them to dry without fermenting around the pit and Read More
Winfield
PrecisionAg InstitutePartner Profile with Winfield United
October 15, 2018
Joel Wipperfurth of Winfield United discusses ag technology trends and topics during the 2018 InfoAg Conference. Read More
Fetters
PrecisionAg InstitutePartner Profile with Simplot Grower Solutions
October 15, 2018
Allan Fetters of Simplot Grower Solutions discusses ag technology trends and topics across the industry, and within the company, during Read More
Chappell
PrecisionAg InstituteEncouraging Employees to Think Into the Future is Winni…
October 15, 2018
EFC Systems CEO Ernie Chappell says his company is always looking ahead to understand growers’ future needs. “It’s not just Read More
Raven-SDSU
PrecisionAg InstitutePartnership with SDSU is One Way Raven Industries Advan…
October 15, 2018
Raven Industries’ partnership with South Dakota State University allows the company to work closely with students and staff to advance Read More
Proagrica
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Kirk Appleford, Proagrica
October 15, 2018
Kirk Appleford joins Paul Schrimpf at the 2018 InfoAg Conference to talk about current ag trends, and Proagrica’s recent acquisition Read More
ESRI
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Charlie Magruder, ESRI
October 15, 2018
Charlie Magruder joins Paul Schrimpf for a discussion of current trends in technology that are impacting ESRI, including news from Read More
Shane-Swedlund
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Shane Swedlund, Raven Industries
October 15, 2018
Shane Swedlund of Raven Industries joins Paul Schrimpf at the 2018 InfoAg Conference to share some key learnings from the Read More
Mike-Gomes
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Mike Gomes, Topcon
October 15, 2018
Mike Gomes of Topcon Precision Agriculture joins Paul Schrimpf, Group Editor of PrecisionAg Professional magazine, for a discussion of key Read More
Ernie-Chappell-and-Paul
PrecisionAg InstituteOne on One with Ernie Chappell, EFC Systems
October 15, 2018
Ernie Chappell of EFC Systems joins Paul Schrimpf, Group Editor of PrecisionAg Professional magazine, to talk about topics and trends Read More
Auto-Thinner
Robotics/Labor SaversPrecision Agriculture in Specialty Crops: Labor, Cost S…
October 9, 2018
Agriculture is going through an equivalent of what the computer industry went through in the 1970s and 1980s. That’s when Read More
Growing-Innovations-logo
EventsA Crazy 2018 is Why We Need Growing Innovations
October 8, 2018
If you’re here you likely have received a special Meister Media Worldwide code to get $100 off your registration to Read More
AmericasConBAP 2018 Highlights Precision Agriculture in Brazil
October 8, 2018
The Brazilian Congress of Precision Agriculture 2018 (ConBAP 2018) was held October 2-4 in Curitiba, Paraná. Held every two years, Read More
GAR-Tootelian-Sensor
Service ProvidersGar Tootelian: Putting Ag Technology to the Test
October 8, 2018
In California’s Central Valley, a diverse crop market in which Pest Control Advisors (PCAs) are the dominant players when it Read More
Spray Drift
Decision Support SoftwareHow Technology Can Help You Prevent Spray Drift
October 8, 2018
Spray drift. News articles about damage caused by spray drift seem to pop up regularly, almost as daily reminders, during Read More