Ensuring Data Privacy In Agriculture

Just about every company connected to agriculture is or is trying to gather data from the farmer. So attests Kris Tom, co-owner of Tom Farms, Leesburg, IN. Such a tsunami of activity confirms not only the value of growers’ information but the need to clarify the legal rights and responsibilities surrounding its use.

Indeed, data privacy has become such an important issue that the American Farm Bureau Federation led a coalition of major farm organizations and agriculture technology providers (ATPs) in drawing up and ultimately signing an agreement on the topic in late 2014. As of May 2015, 34 companies and associations had signed on.

Then too, the House of Representatives’ agriculture committee held a hearing just last October — called “Big Data and Agriculture: Innovation and Implications” — that addressed many data issues, including privacy and security. A number of high profile players in this arena testified, including representatives from The Climate Corp. and AGCO.

Assessing Value

The value of ag data to ATPs is clear. In fact, Dr. Terry Griffin, Associate Professor in Ag Economics, Oklahoma State University, emphasizes that aggregation potential is key for unlocking the full potential of data in enhancing agri-food production, supply chain efficiency and risk management.

But growers are asking what the costs and benefits of sharing data or participating in Big Data communities are for individual farmers. The jury is still out.

For growers, the benefits of sharing data are “still nebulous right now. They haven’t been proven by industry or academia,” says Griffin. Many growers do not see how the benefits will outweigh the costs of joining/sharing. These costs are not even subscription fees but rather perceived unknown costs, he points out.

“I would say most companies aren’t utilizing the data for the benefit of the grower, or return an economic value to farmers,” says grower Tom.

Keith Gingerich, Gingerich Farms, Lovington, IL, has doubts as well. For instance, his farm gives trial plot data to a seed company and doesn’t get much back. “Our biggest frustration is getting feedback or information back that we can use. We put the work into it,” he points out. He does see the trial results out in publications in broad recommendations, but would say to companies, “let’s bring it back to my region or my farm and let me look at it.”

Another question Gingerich has: Are seed companies pricing product higher because they know the value of the hybrid based on vital information he supplied on yield potential, for instance?

Tom Farms’ Tom has found there are quite a few providers and suppliers that “control” the data after it hits their servers. “The problem we see with this is that they can typically do what they wish with it after that point in time, such as sell it to third party or use it in a way that may not be of benefit to the true owner, the grower.” He is encouraged that the majority of providers and suppliers he works with have fairly strong data protection agreements and rules.

Gingerich Farms’ Gingerich ran into a situation where he was trialing a hybrid for a company, turned over plot data, then got a call from a third party doing analytics to clarify some of the information. “We didn’t know they had that. We knew it might happen, but we didn’t know how much they were going to get. As far as we know it was just one field, but we don’t know if it was more,” he describes. “We’ll be resetting some passwords just in case they have access to some of that.”

Data Ownership & The Law

A key part of the privacy debate is data ownership, and the issue was part of last fall’s Congressional hearing.

Dr. Shannon Ferrell, Associate Professor and Ag Law Expert with Oklahoma State University, testified that in the scheme of federal trademark, patent and copyright law, “there is really no good fit for agricultural data.” He does say one could argue that ag data could be protected under state law as a trade secret, but here again the application is not very clear.

“I believe true ownership belongs to the farmer, the data creator,” says grower Tom. “We are the ones who are purchasing the equipment and paying for the service to collect, manage, analyze, and store the data.”

Ferrell says the other big concern in the privacy debate is protections against unauthorized disclosure of agricultural data, from both ATPs and government organizations. Growers can only harness the value of big data “if we can foster an environment in which they are comfortable sharing their data,” he says.

Indeed, Pete Clark, Head of Ag Connections (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Syngenta), says his team’s biggest concern about the use, security, and privacy of growers’ data is that other companies in the space will misrepresent their data use policies and intentions. Syngenta’s AgriEdge Excelsior program digitally organizes data across devices. The company guarantees that information is captured confidentially, and growers control data entry and access.

Clark sees varied levels of concern among growers about data privacy and security — those that completely trust the software platforms companies offer; those who are only comfortable with inputting their data if there is a strong relationship with the data management provider; and that portion of growers who are largely apprehensive.

More Technology Providers Weigh In

A highlight of recent efforts to sort out data privacy is the rights/usage agreements companies offer for growers to sign. Producers need to take the time to read through, understand, and ask questions about end user agreements for the different platforms they use to know if they are comfortable with what may happen to their data, advises Ben Craker, Global ATS Partnerships and Standards, AGCO.

“We are all for utilizing the data to further enhance the agricultural community, but strict measures need to be in place to make sure the anonymity of each farm’s data is kept secure,” says Tom. “The biggest concern we have at the moment is securing our information. Our processes, prescriptions and output are unique to our operation, just like it is to any other farm, which is how we set ourselves apart.”

The team at AGCO would agree, says Craker. The company maintains two customer information pipelines — one for machine data and one for agronomic data. The agronomic information can include yield maps, as-applied or as-planted information, and prescription maps for variable-rate jobs and other pre-planned work.

“AGCO knows this data is often the secret sauce a grower has for raising their crop, and it respects the privacy needed for this type of information,” says Craker. “AGCO does not access, aggregate analyze or even request sharing of this data.”

Ag Leader saw data protection as a concern early on, says Kaleb Lindquist, Product Sales Specialist – Software Solutions. The company addressed the issue right out of the gate when it released its AgFiniti cloud-based platform. “Within our Terms of Use there’s a section that addresses data ownership,” he says. “It clearly states that the data housed is the property of the grower, and the only persons that have access to it, and ultimately use it, are the grower and the advisors that that grower specifically grants access to.”

Ryan Molitor, Marketing and Business Development Operations Manager at Raven Industries, believes that growers are not adopting more precision ag technology because of privacy concerns. “They have questions around who owns the data, who has access to it, and what they would do with it,” he says. “They really understand the benefits of adopting more precision technology, and are even looking at upgrading a lot of their existing equipment with more technology, but want to understand the data side much better.”

Molitor explains that Raven is active with several programs regarding data privacy and standardization. This helps his team to be involved and make sure the company’s equipment stays current with the direction of the industry. More importantly, it gives Raven an opportunity to provide a voice for its customers, including their challenges and concerns, he says.

Kansas State’s Griffin outlines a particular unauthorized access concern. He describes a scenario where a hacker might access a grower’s data system and plant incorrect information. In the Great Lakes region, for instance, an “ecoterrorist” might insert phosphorus overapplication data to make a grower look bad — in a region where algal blooms in Lake Erie have been blamed, in part, on fertilizer runoff from agriculture.

Ultimately, Griffin believes when the data portion of the ag industry is mature, there will be only one repository of ag data — and several groups are in a race to be the repository left standing.

“People ask me who it is, who the successful company will be,” he says. “I don’t know, but I can kind of weed out who it’s not. And it may be one that doesn’t exist today. We’re at the infancy of this whole thing right now, but it’s moving quickly.”

Gingerich Farms’ Gingerich feels that if all data is “lumped together,” there needs to be some monetary compensation to growers, at least a reduction in equipment costs if they’re going to participate. “There needs to be some benefits on the producer side,” he emphasizes.

Leave a Reply

Data Management Stories
Soil Scientists
Data ManagementAccessing USDA Soil Data for Precision Farming
June 13, 2017
Many precision farming websites have integrated the USDA NRCS soil survey database using the USDA Soil Data Access web portal. Read More
BASF Maglis Grower Tablet
Data ManagementData as Currency in Ag: We Aren’t There Yet
May 25, 2017
A hot topic in the precision ag revolution is the idea ag data will become a form of currency. Many Read More
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Means For Growers
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
Trending Articles
PrecisionAg Vision Conference
EventsPrecisionAg® Vision Conference: Focused on the Future
June 13, 2017
PrecisionAg® is pleased to announce the return of its PrecisionAg Vision Conference, October 10-12, 2017. Based on overwhelmingly positive response Read More
Gavin Newsom Forbes AgTech-Summit
ProfessionalsAgTech Summit Aiming High for Modern Farming Solutions
June 12, 2017
THRIVE AgTech, in partnership with SVG Partners and Forbes, is hosting the third annual Forbes AgTech Summit June 28-29 in Read More
Quantix Drone Farmer
DronesTop 10 Most Intriguing Technologies in Agriculture
June 3, 2017
This may be a bit of stating the obvious here, but we’ll throw it out there anyways: as much as Read More
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Means For Growers
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
Mung beans Australia
InternationalPrecision Ag in a Tough Season in Australia
May 8, 2017
This year’s summer crop season has been a tough one for most growers in Australia. Prolonged periods of high temperatures Read More
Latest News
Cotton closeup
Imagery/SensingCotton Growth Management with Precision Agriculture
June 20, 2017
A cotton crop presents some important differences to other commodities that are widely produced in Brazil, such as soybean and Read More
Corn Field
Industry NewsCNBC: Inside Amazon’s Whole Foods Takeover
June 20, 2017
Amazon’s takeover of Whole Foods sent the stock of competing grocery chains plummeting. To understand why, you need to know Read More
DronesNavigating a New World: Drone Technology in Agriculture…
June 20, 2017
My first exposure to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) was as a master’s student at Kansas State University. I was researching Read More
Precision Ag Innovation Series
EventsInnovation Series Agenda Zeroes In On Maximizing Key Se…
June 14, 2017
In a recent survey of service providers conducted by PrecisionAg® Professional magazine, more than seven in 10 indicated that variable Read More
Soil Scientists
Data ManagementAccessing USDA Soil Data for Precision Farming
June 13, 2017
Many precision farming websites have integrated the USDA NRCS soil survey database using the USDA Soil Data Access web portal. Read More
GEOSYS In-Season Imagery
Decision Support SoftwareGeosys Announces Imagery and Weather Data Offering
June 13, 2017
Geosys, a provider of agronomic decision support tools, today launched Geosys Labs, a new program that will make its global Read More
PrecisionAg Vision Conference
EventsPrecisionAg® Vision Conference: Focused on the Future
June 13, 2017
PrecisionAg® is pleased to announce the return of its PrecisionAg Vision Conference, October 10-12, 2017. Based on overwhelmingly positive response Read More
Decision Support SoftwareMyriad Mobile Raises $1.5 Million to Launch New Ag-Tech…
June 12, 2017
Myriad Mobile, a software technology company focused on mobile and web applications, has raised $1.5 million in a Pre-Series A Read More
center-pivot-irrigation-drop-sprinklers-on-corn
Variable Rate ApplicationVariable-Rate Fertigation Can Be Simple
June 12, 2017
A rule is a rule is a rule, right? Well, not always. Sometimes, rules are meant to be changed. Most Read More
Gavin Newsom Forbes AgTech-Summit
ProfessionalsAgTech Summit Aiming High for Modern Farming Solutions
June 12, 2017
THRIVE AgTech, in partnership with SVG Partners and Forbes, is hosting the third annual Forbes AgTech Summit June 28-29 in Read More
Sensors/IoTLeveraging IoT to Improve Data Collection for Agricultu…
June 12, 2017
Between population growth and climate change, farms of all sizes are being challenged to increase yields. Internet of Things (IoT) Read More
DronesAg Drone Update: The Hunt for 1,000 (OPINION)
June 10, 2017
Having obtained my FAA Part 107 Commercial Drone Operators license back in September of last year, I’ve spent the past Read More
Industry NewsMergers & Acquisitions: Land O’Lakes Tosses E…
June 9, 2017
Land O’Lakes has made a minority equity investment in EFC Systems, an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and precision solution provider Read More
Mixmate-featured-image
Decision Support SoftwareHandy Software, Hardware for the Field
June 7, 2017
More than two decades ago, Iowa grower Doug Applegate wished for a “little portable chemical blending system” that could easily Read More
Decision Support SoftwareHarnessing A Team To Build Your Own Software
June 7, 2017
What’s a powerhouse retail network to do when it can’t find a software system to meet incredibly diverse needs? Build Read More
Tim Ferrell Marshall County Co-op
Decision Support SoftwareWhen It’s Time To Switch Software
June 7, 2017
No one in their right mind wants to change software. That’s the opinion of Tim Ferrell, manager of Marshall County Read More
PA Special Report Enterprise
Decision Support SoftwareSpecial Report: Enterprise Management Systems
June 7, 2017
A functional and stable software system can allow a retail operation to run at maximum efficiency, build customer loyalty and Read More
Farming big data style
ProfessionalsAre You REALLY a Precision Farming #Agvocate? This Summ…
June 6, 2017
Go Feed Yourself. That’s the catchphrase of my favorite ag Twitter personality, Shark Farmer (@sf28430), who besides bringing plenty of Read More