Choosing Precision Agriculture Technologies

With the end of winter in sight, many in the agricultural industry are starting to get serious on their choices of precision agriculture technologies for the upcoming growing season. Whether the choice is equipment, software, or just taking soil samples in a new pattern, a lot of thought — accompanied with a lot of anxiety — precedes the actual decision. This decision is commonly made without an appreciation of the value expectations on the part of the user (e.g., grower, consultant, rep) and the hidden costs on the part of the provider of the technologies. In this article, I wish to discuss how the precision agriculture “ante” for making a choice is much greater than the purchase price — with some important implications for an organization. I have added some visuals to help elucidate my arguments.

The precision agriculture ante can be best understood with the interplay of two curves: perceived or demonstrated value of new technology to improve production (technology value) vs. user cost, and the necessary user education of the new technology (user education) vs. seller cost. I have assumed in my arguments that the seller will initially bear the cost of educating a user on a new technology. As a technology becomes mature, third-party vendors may provide another educational option. I will first discuss each curve and then discuss the interplay between them. A graph of the technology value (in terms of improved production) versus user cost curve is in Figure 1 , while a graph of the user education versus seller cost is in Figure 2.

The technology value vs. user cost curve in Figure 1 is the classic “diminishing return” curve. There is a diminishing return in the production value for each successive investment in new technology (dotted lines in figure). Viewed another way, you get the biggest bang for your buck on your first purchase of a new technology with lesser returns on future purchases relative to the improvement in production (e.g., higher yields, more efficiency).

The user education versus seller curve in Figure 2 has the inverse relationship to the “diminishing return” curve in Figure 1. There is an increasing return in the education of the user of a new technology for each successive investment in training (dotted lines in figure). In other words, a user can more quickly grasp new technologies after getting an initial grounding with the first technology. However, the increase in user education comes at an increasing cost to the seller. Now, with an understanding of what each curve means alone, we combine them to get greater insight into the precision agriculture ante.

The Education Equation

The interplay of the curves reveals the age-old struggle between introducing a new technology to a user and at the same time providing adequate education to support that technology. In the best case for both the user and seller, the introduced technology is simple to use (little education at little cost to seller) and has been proven to have high value towards improving production (high value at little cost to user). Since the best case rarely happens, we can explore other more likely scenarios, the extreme of which are dreaded by both the user and seller alike.

The first more likely scenario is that the user needs more education and support to use the new technology (more training at more cost to seller), but there is a demonstrated value of improved production after adapting the technology (high value at little cost to user). The result is that the seller is frustrated (because of additional training costs) even though there is delivery on the technology.

The second more likely scenario is that the user sees little value in the new technology even after receiving adequate education from seller. The result of this second scenario is the user is frustrated (because of diminishing return in value of the new technology relative to earlier technologies) even though there is delivery on the technology. The most dreaded interplay of the curves is when the user fails to see the value of the new technology in production and the seller keeps spending on the education of the user to adapt the technology. In this worst case, both the user and seller are frustrated and there is no delivery on the technology (at least as perceived by the user).

The best and worst cases for the interplay of curves have far reaching implications for an organization. In the best case of high value to user with little education cost to seller, both the user and seller end up on a positive note. The user sees the value that precision agriculture brings to its organization and will be favorably disposed to try new technologies in the future. Furthermore, the same user will be more patient if there is the need for more education with a new technology since the value of the first technology has been established. The seller needs, however, to be aware that the user may see a diminishing return on the next technologies relative to the success of the first and therefore must adjust marketing goals accordingly.

In the worst case of low or no value to user with ongoing education costs to seller, both the user and seller immediately start off on a negative note. The user rejects the technology and with it all future innovations in precision agriculture, while the seller goes out of business. In this worst case, the organization of the user very likely will become less competitive with its neighbors as the new technologies bring benefits to them. The “gun shy” user organization and the failed seller company represent a setback to all of precision agriculture.

The take-home message of the “curves” is that both the user and seller must be aware of the value of a new technology relative to previously adapted technologies and set expectations accordingly. Both the user and seller must be aware of the true educational needs of the user when introducing a new technology. Without this awareness, the ante for technology adoption may be so high that neither the user nor the seller will want to gamble on precision agriculture.

Editor’s note: This article first appeared in the Spring 2007 issue of PrecisionAg Special Reports.

Leave a Reply

Systems Management Stories
BASF Maglis Grower Tablet
Data ManagementData as Currency in Ag: We Aren’t There Yet
May 25, 2017
A hot topic in the precision ag revolution is the idea ag data will become a form of currency. Many Read More
Hagie sprayer
GuidanceWhat’s New and What’s Next from Hagie Manufacturing
May 16, 2017
Many were surprised by John Deere’s announcement last spring that it had acquired majority ownership of Hagie Manufacturing Co., a Read More
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
Ag Tech GlobalVenture Capital News: Aerial Imagery Outfit Garners $5 Mil in Series A
May 11, 2017
Ceres Imaging, an aerial spectral imagery and analytics company serving the agricultural sector, today announced it has raised a $5 Read More
Trending Articles
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Means For Growers
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
Mung beans Australia
Ag Tech GlobalPrecision Ag in a Tough Season in Australia
May 8, 2017
This year’s summer crop season has been a tough one for most growers in Australia. Prolonged periods of high temperatures Read More
GPS, Guidance
Business ManagementPromoting Precision Agricultural Innovation in a Risk Averse Marketplace
April 24, 2017
As precision agriculture consultants we constantly are being asked our opinions on where to invest, and how to strategically invest Read More
Data ManagementInnovation Series Highlights: The Weather Company’s Rob Berglund on Cognitive Computing
April 19, 2017
Rob Berglund, global director of sales, energy and agriculture at The Weather Company, discusses IBM’s Watson and applications for advanced analytics that will fundamentally change Read More
Corn close up
Data ManagementFarmers Business Network Releases State of the Industry Style Report
April 17, 2017
Farmer’s Business Network (FBN) released today its “The Voice of the Farmer”, a special research report on the state of Read More
Latest News
BASF Maglis Grower Tablet
Data ManagementData as Currency in Ag: We Aren’t There Yet
May 25, 2017
A hot topic in the precision ag revolution is the idea ag data will become a form of currency. Many Read More
Ag Tech GlobalSci-Fi in Ag: The Waging War of Plant-Internet Bots
May 25, 2017
Article Notes: This monthly column takes some crazy sounding ideas and applies them to the field of Ag Tech. The Read More
Food IT Fork-to-Farm
Hort TechThe Mixing Bowl Event Connects Technology, Food, and Ag…
May 24, 2017
For the fourth consecutive year, The Mixing Bowl presents FOOD IT, under the theme “Fork to Farm.” Action-oriented entrepreneurs, industry Read More
Nematodes in cotton
Ag Tech GlobalUsing Precision Agriculture to Manage Nematodes in Braz…
May 22, 2017
As promised in my first article, this month I am writing about some technical aspects related to the use of Read More
Farmers on Tablet Photo Credit All About Food
Professionals6 Keys of Successful Precision Agriculture Tools
May 17, 2017
As precision agriculture professionals we are frequently approached by companies that wish to partner with our organization in order to Read More
Hagie sprayer
GuidanceWhat’s New and What’s Next from Hagie Manufacturing
May 16, 2017
Many were surprised by John Deere’s announcement last spring that it had acquired majority ownership of Hagie Manufacturing Co., a Read More
Hortau Irrigation Management Software
Ag Tech GlobalHortau Commemorates 15 Years in Ag Tech
May 15, 2017
Today, Hortau celebrates its 15-year anniversary as one of the pioneers in the AgTech space, according to a press release Read More
Kip Tom
Ag Tech GlobalAg Tech: On the Cusp of Something Big?
May 15, 2017
The investment and ag-tech sectors’ continuing courtship of agriculture, smoldering for three or four years now, was well in evidence at Read More
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
Ag Tech Global2017 International Tomato Congress Features Ag Tech Ses…
May 11, 2017
The International Tomato Congress has taken place in Mexico since 2006. In 2017 it will celebrate its twelfth year as Read More
Ag Tech GlobalVenture Capital News: Aerial Imagery Outfit Garners $5 …
May 11, 2017
Ceres Imaging, an aerial spectral imagery and analytics company serving the agricultural sector, today announced it has raised a $5 Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Mea…
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
DronesSentera Phoenix Drone Nears Coveted 1,000 Acre Coverage…
May 11, 2017
Sentera introduces its Phoenix fixed-wing drone product line, with variants to support the precision agriculture, mapping, and public safety industries, Read More
Data ManagementClimate Adds Irrigation Data Analytics via HydroBio Acq…
May 9, 2017
Today, The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto Co., announced the acquisition of HydroBio, an agriculture software company based in Read More
GuidanceTersus adds RTK-Based AutoSteer System to GNSS Offering…
May 8, 2017
Tersus GNSS Inc., a Chinese GNSS RTK manufacturing company, released its brand new AutoSteer solution recently. The AG960 AutoSteer System Read More
DronesAgEagle takes on the Big Boys with RX48 Fixed Wing Dron…
May 8, 2017
AgEagle Aerial Systems of Neodesha, KS, today announced a fixed wing drone for the use in precision agriculture that far Read More
Mung beans Australia
Ag Tech GlobalPrecision Ag in a Tough Season in Australia
May 8, 2017
This year’s summer crop season has been a tough one for most growers in Australia. Prolonged periods of high temperatures Read More
SDWG Bret Weisenburger
Decision Support SoftwareMZB Launching New Grid Tool, Updated Mapping Center
May 3, 2017
MZB Technologies has added an additional tool to its precision system. Known for its patented zone-based precision technology, MZB will Read More