Opinion: The Agricultural Drone War Is Over, And They Lost

If you are late to the aerial imagery party and think that agricultural drones are the vehicle that are the be all, end all answer to your imagery needs, you are going to lose and lose big at that. But before we get into that, let’s take a trip back down memory lane to the spring of 2014. It seemed like everyone and their brother was taking to the skies for the first time with their brand new drone. It was the hot trend and dozens of companies emerged seemingly overnight that built and sold drones.

In fact, I remember attending a drone field day in Decatur, IL, that hosted dozens of companies and their drones with hundreds of other ag professionals like myself in attendance. The drones demonstrated that day ranged from just barely a step up from being homemade, all the way up to military grade. Some systems seemed very sophisticated and others less so. It was a very interesting event and it seemed like the future of drones was very bright.

Fast forward three years and only two or three of those companies from that event are still players in the drone business. The drone companies today seem to do a pretty fantastic job of delivering aerial imagery via a drone and use equally fantastic software to stich it all together into something actionable by the grower. However, despite all of this great technology, there are some pretty big limitations in converting this great technology into a successful commercial agricultural drone program.

First, let’s recognize that the important information collected by aerial imagery is NDVI imagery. This is important so we can detect issues out in the field before they are visible with the naked eye so we can in turn correct the issues out in the field while minimizing the yield loss, and ideally maximizing our profit potential. With this in mind, the ultimate goal of collecting NDVI imagery is to collect it at the correct time and turn it around into data that is actionable out in the field as quickly as possible.

With drones, there are some severe limitations in achieving these goals at a level that can be scaled into a successful business model, so let’s explore some of these issues:

Licensing
There are now laws in place that require you to have a license if you are going to fly a drone for commercial use. While it is not necessarily difficult to obtain your license, there are several steps to take and a few hoops to jump through to get licensed from the FAA. This licensing is a really good thing since it educates drone operators on important issues such as airspace, flying within line of sight (unless you have obtained a waiver), and other topics that ensure safe flying habits. However, the drawback of this is that if you have zero aeronautical knowledge going into the test your only chance of passing is by taking a two-day prep course. While this isn’t that big of an issue and there are some terrific courses out there, it is still two days of your time.

Logistics and Time
There are also only so many flyable days per year, particularly during the window where the data we collect can be turned around into actionable data. I live in Illinois and I always seem to be pushing weather conditions in one way or another, whether it is the high winds that are common in Illinois or patchy cloud cover that casts uneven lighting over fields. These issues can be amplified when you consider the time it takes to travel to each field, the distance between fields, the amount of acres that need to be covered to turn a profit, and the fact that we all have responsibilities far beyond operating a drone in the field. With these in mind, the window to collect data via a drone is limited. When you consider where the grain markets are at today, it becomes a real challenge to provide this service at an affordable cost to the grower.

Downed Drone
Finding a downed drone can often feel like looking for a needle in a haystack.

Crashes
Another key point is that drones tend to crash. Some models and/or operators tend to have crashes more than others, but if you’re reading this and you’ve flown a drone, you know darn well that you’ve crashed it at one point or another whether you will admit it or not. I myself have spent many days walking through pollinating cornfields on hot summer days looking for my downed drones. The word miserable doesn’t even begin to describe those experiences.

At this point in time I can safely say that the fad of “Hey everybody, look at this cool tech I have! I’m not really sure if I’m adding that much value to the actual bottom line, but it’s just so COOL!” has run its course. Now that this novelty has worn off, we have to get down to brass tacks by collecting and analyzing actionable NDVI imagery in a high volume, low cost way to the grower. With this in mind, collecting NDVI imagery with a drone is the equivalent of bringing a knife to a gun fight, so let’s talk about the other vehicles for collecting this imagery.

Airplanes
Airplanes have a few distinct advantages over drones. First, they can legally operate over 400 feet meaning that they typically don’t have to make multiple swaths over a field to collect an image. Second, the flight time on an airplane is much longer than most drones out there today. With those two factors alone, airplanes can simply cover exponentially more acres in a day than a drone can. The drawback is that you do need a plane and a pilot, but there are many companies that can provide both of these.

SpaceX Falcon 9
A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket after landing on the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You.

Satellites
Satellites are useful but have many limitations as well. If it’s cloudy every 10-16 days when the satellite gets in position in its orbit to take pictures of your field, then you are out of luck for that round. The imagery isn’t as high of quality as the imagery collected from drones or airplanes, but it can be useful for general observations on a whole field level. Exciting things are happening in the aerospace industry right now and new companies like SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, and Blue Origin are driving the price of launching rockets into space down significantly by creating rockets that can be reused multiple times. This ultimately means that a larger number of newer satellites could be put into orbit in a shorter period of time that could provide more opportunities to take higher quality imagery. While this could take time to become a reality, it does make the future of satellite imagery seem promising.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to sound like a complete drone hater; I just think they have their place as a tool to take RGB photographs of issues that we can’t necessarily see from the ground and need to look at right away. But to get real, actionable NDVI data during the decision making window at an economical cost, drones are not an ideal vehicle at this point in time. I can see a very valid argument for using drones in high dollar specialty crops; but with the depressed grain markets of today, it is really difficult to scale a drone program in the Midwest.

Maybe one day drones will make a comeback. I mean the technology is certainly there to do some interesting things, but the legislative piece will make that very difficult for the foreseeable future. For now, we need to be realistic about how we collect NDVI aerial imagery in a time and cost effective manner, and drones just aren’t the answer.

As for me, I’m taking a systems approach this year by incorporating drones, planes, and satellites into my aerial imagery program by utilizing the strengths of each platform. With that being said, I will be flying a drone this year but it will be a very small part of my overall aerial imagery program and it will be used solely for RGB images.

Leave a Reply

18 comments on “Opinion: The Agricultural Drone War Is Over, And They Lost

  1. You fail to account for long endurance, crash-proof drones. There are fixed wing models with 9 hours flight time. Add breakaway wing connectors and a protected sensor package and problems solved.

    1. Bret, that’s some great technology but our laws don’t allow us to utilize it to it’s full potential, which is unfortunate.

  2. I think you hit on some good points. On the west coast with higher value crops they have been instrumental. It’s pretty important though that they are Ag specific like SenseFly or HoneyComb, but DJI is good for quick RGB imagery. Have a good way of processing data is also pretty important. At least in our operations.

    1. Edward, those are excellent points and I agree that drones do make more sense in high value crops. Also understand that my perspective comes from the standpoint of being a row cropper out in the Midwest where crop prices and margins are pretty tight.

  3. Ben: I had zero aeronautical knowledge, didn’t pay a cent for any two day courses/ground school training, and passed the 107 exam on my first try.

      1. Matthew, the people I have talked to within the GROWMARK system who have also gone through the course have all agreed that we are better for having taken the 2 day course. Not only did it help us pass the test, but more importantly it gave us knowledge that was not previously available to help us fly more safely, which we can all agree is a good thing.

        And I’d come at you, bro, but I wouldn’t want to risk my journalistic integrity nor my professionalism by becoming an internet troll. ; P

  4. I definitely agree with several points you’ve made. I realized during my first year of collecting NDVI imagery that all I was doing was creating 10 more questions to get answered. All NDVI does is tell you that there is a problem, but nothing else. You can’t identify the issue effecting the field with it, and you certainly can’t accurately quantify how big the issue is! If you can’t answer the questions that farmers want answered, then you’re right. Drones are next to worthless right now… HOWEVER, if you could identify the issue effecting the field, accurately quantify how big the issue is, and make a suggestion or recommendation for the farmer, then you’re onto something. We’ve developed a method that does exactly that, and we certainly don’t use NDVI to do it. However, we will be using some multi-spec imagery for variable rate apps. I had a farmer tell me the other day, “when my wife cooks a cake, I could care less how she cooks it, I just want my piece of cake.” In other words, he wants these questions answered: What’s my problem? How big is it? What do I have to do to fix it? And he wants these answers in well laid out, already quantified report so he can make a decision. NOT SORT THROUGH A BUNCH of uninterpreted DATA. That is the disconnect in this industry, right there. We have a totally new program this year that cuts through all of the noise. We give the farmer the “piece of cake” answer he needs to make a decision in well laid out, already quantified report.

  5. dead on! we as consultants have been lamenting this since the first drone was even talked about. And not to mentioned getting out into the middle of a 320-640 acre corn field in July-August to investigate. and also, very importantly, is it an issue that is correctable this year or any down the road consistently and how many planes are set up to VR pesticides. Now if you’re in the pesticide sales business, anything that helps sell more product, regardless of farmer profitability, is a great new tool. I’ll just stop there before I really get on a roll.

    Kim Retzlaff
    Senior Agronomist
    Owner, Applied Agronomics Consulting
    Aberdeen, S.D.
    605-380-8595
    [email protected]

  6. The problem is not the drone, it is the sensor and the agronomists. All (most) commercially available sensors measure NDVI but this vegetation index is not the one that is important to measure by UAV as it is now freely available from satellite (Landsat, Sentinel-2) at various timings and these satellite images should be the same as the drone images (else you have a problem with drone measurements). NDVI (and consorts) is used as an instantaneous data by agronomists but it is a cumulative data and when you use data the wrong way, your results are wrong … clients (farmers) clearly see that promises are way beyond reality. Brain use was geared towards marketing a bad solution rather than trying to find working solutions. There are solutions for better yields and/or quality but they require more flexibility in sensors (wavelengths provided) and a little bit of HI (Human Intelligence). Check my posts on Linkedin for more information or contact me directly.

  7. As a drone manufacturers, we recognize several valid points in the article. Expectations from both growers and manufacturers were high and often times a bit unrealistic. Drones were not the silver bullet many had thought. They are tools to help deliver more information. The images only help guide WHERE to look and identify potential problems, thus a more efficient use of time. Those same images can be exported into farm management software to create prescription maps for a more efficient use of chemicals. Also, FAA rules have been reduced so operational requirements continue to be much easier and, at some point when the FAA will extend beyond line of sight flights and higher than the 400′ current altitude restriction, then drones will be even more cost effective.

    We also are seeing a trend where ag drones are flown more by service providers rather than the growers themselves which makes a lot of sense. Growers want to get information and data to guide decisions while they manage multi-million dollar operations, not spend time acquiring the data, so they hire pro fliers with a fleet of various drone platforms to get them the details.

    Drones are still in the early stages of development and their presence will not go away or get smaller. They will become more automated, fly longer, more reliable and cost efficient. As an example, our current production model is huge improvement from the technology just 3 years ago and each week brings a new development in auto pilots, air frames, sensors and image processing technology.

    Tom Nichol
    AgEagle Aerial Systems

Drones Stories
DronesSentera Phoenix Drone Nears Coveted 1,000 Acre Coverage Ceiling
May 11, 2017
Sentera introduces its Phoenix fixed-wing drone product line, with variants to support the precision agriculture, mapping, and public safety industries, Read More
DronesAgEagle takes on the Big Boys with RX48 Fixed Wing Drone
May 8, 2017
AgEagle Aerial Systems of Neodesha, KS, today announced a fixed wing drone for the use in precision agriculture that far Read More
Sentera
DronesSentera Announces May Release of Multispectral Double 4K Sensor for DJI Drones
April 27, 2017
Sentera announced the release of its Multispectral Double 4K Sensor, offering five precise spectral bands: blue, green, red, red edge, Read More
Sentera drone
DronesSentera Debuts Enhanced North America Dealer Network
April 11, 2017
Sentera today announced the availability of its precision agriculture solutions at over 350 retail locations across North America. By broadening Read More
Trending Articles
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Means For Growers
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
Mung beans Australia
Ag Tech GlobalPrecision Ag in a Tough Season in Australia
May 8, 2017
This year’s summer crop season has been a tough one for most growers in Australia. Prolonged periods of high temperatures Read More
GPS, Guidance
Business ManagementPromoting Precision Agricultural Innovation in a Risk Averse Marketplace
April 24, 2017
As precision agriculture consultants we constantly are being asked our opinions on where to invest, and how to strategically invest Read More
Data ManagementInnovation Series Highlights: The Weather Company’s Rob Berglund on Cognitive Computing
April 19, 2017
Rob Berglund, global director of sales, energy and agriculture at The Weather Company, discusses IBM’s Watson and applications for advanced analytics that will fundamentally change Read More
Corn close up
Data ManagementFarmers Business Network Releases State of the Industry Style Report
April 17, 2017
Farmer’s Business Network (FBN) released today its “The Voice of the Farmer”, a special research report on the state of Read More
Latest News
Nematodes in cotton
Ag Tech GlobalUsing Precision Agriculture to Manage Nematodes in Braz…
May 22, 2017
As promised in my first article, this month I am writing about some technical aspects related to the use of Read More
Farmers on Tablet Photo Credit All About Food
Professionals6 Keys of Successful Precision Agriculture Tools
May 17, 2017
As precision agriculture professionals we are frequently approached by companies that wish to partner with our organization in order to Read More
Hagie sprayer
GuidanceWhat’s New and What’s Next from Hagie Manufacturing
May 16, 2017
Many were surprised by John Deere’s announcement last spring that it had acquired majority ownership of Hagie Manufacturing Co., a Read More
Hortau Irrigation Management Software
Ag Tech GlobalHortau Commemorates 15 Years in Ag Tech
May 15, 2017
Today, Hortau celebrates its 15-year anniversary as one of the pioneers in the AgTech space, according to a press release Read More
Kip Tom
Ag Tech GlobalAg Tech: On the Cusp of Something Big?
May 15, 2017
The investment and ag-tech sectors’ continuing courtship of agriculture, smoldering for three or four years now, was well in evidence at Read More
Farming iPad
Data ManagementOpinion: ROI or Die in Precision Agriculture
May 12, 2017
The thought of $3.50 corn for the foreseeable future seems pretty disheartening. However, if you look at the precision ag Read More
Ag Tech Global2017 International Tomato Congress Features Ag Tech Ses…
May 11, 2017
The International Tomato Congress has taken place in Mexico since 2006. In 2017 it will celebrate its twelfth year as Read More
Ag Tech GlobalVenture Capital News: Aerial Imagery Outfit Garners $5 …
May 11, 2017
Ceres Imaging, an aerial spectral imagery and analytics company serving the agricultural sector, today announced it has raised a $5 Read More
BASF Maglis grower retailer tablet
Data ManagementQ&A: What BASF’s Latest Foray into Precision Ag Mea…
May 11, 2017
In late April, BASF agreed to acquire U.S. precision ag player ZedX, a leader in the development of agronomic weather, Read More
DronesSentera Phoenix Drone Nears Coveted 1,000 Acre Coverage…
May 11, 2017
Sentera introduces its Phoenix fixed-wing drone product line, with variants to support the precision agriculture, mapping, and public safety industries, Read More
Data ManagementClimate Adds Irrigation Data Analytics via HydroBio Acq…
May 9, 2017
Today, The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto Co., announced the acquisition of HydroBio, an agriculture software company based in Read More
GuidanceTersus adds RTK-Based AutoSteer System to GNSS Offering…
May 8, 2017
Tersus GNSS Inc., a Chinese GNSS RTK manufacturing company, released its brand new AutoSteer solution recently. The AG960 AutoSteer System Read More
DronesAgEagle takes on the Big Boys with RX48 Fixed Wing Dron…
May 8, 2017
AgEagle Aerial Systems of Neodesha, KS, today announced a fixed wing drone for the use in precision agriculture that far Read More
Mung beans Australia
Ag Tech GlobalPrecision Ag in a Tough Season in Australia
May 8, 2017
This year’s summer crop season has been a tough one for most growers in Australia. Prolonged periods of high temperatures Read More
SDWG Bret Weisenburger
Decision Support SoftwareMZB Launching New Grid Tool, Updated Mapping Center
May 3, 2017
MZB Technologies has added an additional tool to its precision system. Known for its patented zone-based precision technology, MZB will Read More
Ag Tech GlobalBig Ticket Items: IoT’s True Value Emerging Through Far…
May 3, 2017
Farms need to do more with less than ever before to remain competitive. This is especially true when it comes Read More
Industry NewsMonsanto Jettisons 2015 Deere-Precision Planting Deal
May 2, 2017
Deere & Co. announced it was informed by Monsanto Company that it has chosen to terminate a 2015 agreement for Read More
Growers Tablet
Data ManagementOpinion: The Yearly Death of Ag Data
May 1, 2017
So that headline sounds somewhat dark and ominous, doesn’t it? The thing about it is that it’s actually been happening Read More