Choosing Precision Agriculture Technologies

With the end of winter in sight, many in the agricultural industry are starting to get serious on their choices of precision agriculture technologies for the upcoming growing season. Whether the choice is equipment, software, or just taking soil samples in a new pattern, a lot of thought — accompanied with a lot of anxiety — precedes the actual decision. This decision is commonly made without an appreciation of the value expectations on the part of the user (e.g., grower, consultant, rep) and the hidden costs on the part of the provider of the technologies. In this article, I wish to discuss how the precision agriculture “ante” for making a choice is much greater than the purchase price — with some important implications for an organization. I have added some visuals to help elucidate my arguments.

The precision agriculture ante can be best understood with the interplay of two curves: perceived or demonstrated value of new technology to improve production (technology value) vs. user cost, and the necessary user education of the new technology (user education) vs. seller cost. I have assumed in my arguments that the seller will initially bear the cost of educating a user on a new technology. As a technology becomes mature, third-party vendors may provide another educational option. I will first discuss each curve and then discuss the interplay between them. A graph of the technology value (in terms of improved production) versus user cost curve is in Figure 1 , while a graph of the user education versus seller cost is in Figure 2.

The technology value vs. user cost curve in Figure 1 is the classic “diminishing return” curve. There is a diminishing return in the production value for each successive investment in new technology (dotted lines in figure). Viewed another way, you get the biggest bang for your buck on your first purchase of a new technology with lesser returns on future purchases relative to the improvement in production (e.g., higher yields, more efficiency).

The user education versus seller curve in Figure 2 has the inverse relationship to the “diminishing return” curve in Figure 1. There is an increasing return in the education of the user of a new technology for each successive investment in training (dotted lines in figure). In other words, a user can more quickly grasp new technologies after getting an initial grounding with the first technology. However, the increase in user education comes at an increasing cost to the seller. Now, with an understanding of what each curve means alone, we combine them to get greater insight into the precision agriculture ante.

The Education Equation

The interplay of the curves reveals the age-old struggle between introducing a new technology to a user and at the same time providing adequate education to support that technology. In the best case for both the user and seller, the introduced technology is simple to use (little education at little cost to seller) and has been proven to have high value towards improving production (high value at little cost to user). Since the best case rarely happens, we can explore other more likely scenarios, the extreme of which are dreaded by both the user and seller alike.

The first more likely scenario is that the user needs more education and support to use the new technology (more training at more cost to seller), but there is a demonstrated value of improved production after adapting the technology (high value at little cost to user). The result is that the seller is frustrated (because of additional training costs) even though there is delivery on the technology.

The second more likely scenario is that the user sees little value in the new technology even after receiving adequate education from seller. The result of this second scenario is the user is frustrated (because of diminishing return in value of the new technology relative to earlier technologies) even though there is delivery on the technology. The most dreaded interplay of the curves is when the user fails to see the value of the new technology in production and the seller keeps spending on the education of the user to adapt the technology. In this worst case, both the user and seller are frustrated and there is no delivery on the technology (at least as perceived by the user).

The best and worst cases for the interplay of curves have far reaching implications for an organization. In the best case of high value to user with little education cost to seller, both the user and seller end up on a positive note. The user sees the value that precision agriculture brings to its organization and will be favorably disposed to try new technologies in the future. Furthermore, the same user will be more patient if there is the need for more education with a new technology since the value of the first technology has been established. The seller needs, however, to be aware that the user may see a diminishing return on the next technologies relative to the success of the first and therefore must adjust marketing goals accordingly.

In the worst case of low or no value to user with ongoing education costs to seller, both the user and seller immediately start off on a negative note. The user rejects the technology and with it all future innovations in precision agriculture, while the seller goes out of business. In this worst case, the organization of the user very likely will become less competitive with its neighbors as the new technologies bring benefits to them. The “gun shy” user organization and the failed seller company represent a setback to all of precision agriculture.

The take-home message of the “curves” is that both the user and seller must be aware of the value of a new technology relative to previously adapted technologies and set expectations accordingly. Both the user and seller must be aware of the true educational needs of the user when introducing a new technology. Without this awareness, the ante for technology adoption may be so high that neither the user nor the seller will want to gamble on precision agriculture.

Editor’s note: This article first appeared in the Spring 2007 issue of PrecisionAg Special Reports.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trends Stories
Business2016 Farm Science Review: Talkin’ New Products, Education and Big Data
September 21, 2016
The Ohio State University’s Farm Science Review has become an annual rite of fall for Buckeye State growers, retailers and Read More
BusinessGMO Aphids to Battle Weeds? It’s Not as Far Fetched as You Think…
September 21, 2016
No, I am not talking about optimizing aphids for a global agricultural armageddon. That would be silly. I’m talking about Read More
Best PracticesPrecision Ag’s Role in Getting Nitrogen Right For a Better Environment
September 2, 2016
Scientists can be forgiven for thinking that when they come up with optimized methods for accomplishing some task, end-users will Read More
Drone Technology in UK
BusinessFire Up Those Drones! FAA Part 107 is Live
August 29, 2016
(EDITOR’S NOTE: Today is a day that many in this industry have been awaiting for quite some time. With today’s Read More
Trending Articles
Business2016 Farm Science Review: Talkin’ New Products, Education and Big Data
September 21, 2016
The Ohio State University’s Farm Science Review has become an annual rite of fall for Buckeye State growers, retailers and Read More
Mitchell Technical Institute students with drone
IntegratorsMTI Precision Ag Students Use Drone Technology
September 19, 2016
After weeks of sitting in the classroom, several Mitchell Technical Institute students were able to spend a few hours outside Read More
Robotics AGCO Fendt Guide Connect
Market ImpactReport: Ag Robots And Drones May Be A $10 Billion Market By 2022
September 7, 2016
Robots and drones have begun to quietly transform many aspects of agriculture. In fact, the IDTechEx Research report on Agricultural Read More
SDWG Bret Weisenburger
BusinessMZB Technologies, Climate FieldView Announce Data Integration for 2017 Season
September 6, 2016
MZB Technologies announces a data connectivity agreement with The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto Co., providing increased precision agriculture Read More
Deere R4023 cab
BusinessReport: Smart Agriculture Market Worth $19 Billion By 2021
September 6, 2016
Research and Markets has announced the addition of the “Smart Agriculture Market – With Forecast (2016-2021)” report to their offering. Read More
SDWG Bret Weisenburger
IntegratorsThe Top 10 People In Precision Agriculture
August 15, 2016
Precision agriculture — with all its wacky technologies and advanced algorithms and such — remains a people business. So, without Read More
Latest News
A Satshot NDVIR analysis running on an iPad.
BusinessSatshot’s Landscout IOS Now API Linked With John …
September 28, 2016
Satshot’s Landscout IOS mobile software is now connected with the John Deere Operations Center through John Deere’s API services. Landscout Read More
Ag Drone
BusinessDroneDeploy Launches Turbo Uploader
September 27, 2016
DroneDeploy today announced a new solution that addresses drone data portability challenges in remote areas that have Internet bandwidth constraints. Read More
FUSE Farm Graphic
DataAGCO Is Founding Member Of The DKE Data-Hub Initiative
September 26, 2016
AGCO Corp., a world-leading manufacturer and distributor of agricultural equipment, has announced its participation as a founding member of the DKE Read More
Ian Yule, ISPA
ResearchLeading Ag Technology Researcher Appointed ISPA Preside…
September 26, 2016
Massey University’s Professor Ian Yule, one of the world’s leading agri-tech researchers, has been voted president of the International Society Read More
BusinessADAPT Conversion Toolkit Making In Roads With Equipment…
September 22, 2016
A leading group of equipment manufacturers will soon release products that greatly enhance a grower’s ability to manage data across Read More
Business2016 Farm Science Review: Talkin’ New Products, Educati…
September 21, 2016
The Ohio State University’s Farm Science Review has become an annual rite of fall for Buckeye State growers, retailers and Read More
Farmers Edge Truck
DataFarmers Edge Awarded $6.1M Investment From Sustainable …
September 21, 2016
Farmers Edge, a global leader in precision agriculture and independent data management solutions, has announced that it will receive $6,107,563 Read More
BusinessGMO Aphids to Battle Weeds? It’s Not as Far Fetch…
September 21, 2016
No, I am not talking about optimizing aphids for a global agricultural armageddon. That would be silly. I’m talking about Read More
Young Corn Field
Best PracticesNitrogen: The Key to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
September 20, 2016
Precision ag can play a key role in reducing agriculture’s impact on greenhouse gases by limiting the nitrogen rate. Read More
W. Wade Robey, Raven
Industry NewsRaven Adds New Director Of Engineering
September 19, 2016
W. Wade Robey, Ph.D., joined Raven Applied Technology in August 2016 as Director of Engineering. In this role, he leads Read More
Mitchell Technical Institute students with drone
IntegratorsMTI Precision Ag Students Use Drone Technology
September 19, 2016
After weeks of sitting in the classroom, several Mitchell Technical Institute students were able to spend a few hours outside Read More
BusinessOPINION: Climate Corp. is the Jewel in Bayer’s Monsanto…
September 15, 2016
PERSPECTIVE: Over the next few days and weeks in the ag media space the major players will examine this latest Read More
Sugarcane India
Market ImpactPlantations International Brings Precision Farming Tech…
September 14, 2016
Hong Kong-based plantation and farm management company Plantations International has announced it is moving its contact centre from the Indian Read More
Corn close up
Start-UpsLewis & Clark Ventures Raises $20 Million For Agric…
September 13, 2016
Lewis & Clark Ventures, a venture capital firm focused on Series A and B stage investments, has announced $20 million Read More
BusinessSentera Joins Forces With Another Drone Distributor
September 13, 2016
Sentera has signed an exclusive distribution agreement with Dynamic UAV Solutions North America, LLC, a new distributor in the commercial Read More
New Zealand agriculture
Market ImpactPrecision Ag Technology Helping New Zealand Agriculture…
September 12, 2016
New Zealand has an enormous opportunity to use technology as a means to support the economic growth of its agri Read More
Robotics AGCO Fendt Guide Connect
Market ImpactReport: Ag Robots And Drones May Be A $10 Billion Marke…
September 7, 2016
Robots and drones have begun to quietly transform many aspects of agriculture. In fact, the IDTechEx Research report on Agricultural Read More
EventsPrecisionAg Vision Conference: Find Your Future in Phoe…
September 7, 2016
As the summer winds down and harvest begins in earnest, the time for immersing ourselves in future planning is getting Read More