Security Still a Concern
BY PAUL SCHRIMPF My experience and discussions with folks at the International Conference on Precision Agriculture last week had me considering the ramifications of the next big movement in precision technology -- wireless data transfer. It was mentioned to me on several occasions that growers are getting less concerned, and more comfortable with, the idea of wireless data transfer from cab to office, or from cab to Web to office. So I posed it to you all to provide feedback on the question.
Well, while no one jumped out of their chair and sent me a comment on this post, the reader poll results indicated that 60 percent of you are concerned about data security in wireless situations, and one-third of you are very concerned.
Honestly, that number would probably have been higher five years ago when the Internet was still largely hard-wired and wireless security did not appear to be very secure. But wireless is everywhere now, for better or worse. I encountered an Ace Hardware outlet in a sparsely populated area of southwestern Pennsylvania a couple weeks ago that was complaining about its tower internet service. "We go down once a day, and we have to switch to dial up," said the clerk. "But we are not allowed to sell anything by credit card without approval from the system."
Despite the problems, wireless data is here to stay ... perhaps as we move forward, manufacturers can provide us more assurance about the security of data shooting across the airwaves ... feel free to weigh in by commenting below.
Comments
John.Nowatzki@ndsu.edu said …What format and frequency will we use for the wireless data transfer on farms? We use 802.11wireless on a demonstration project operating on 900 Gigahertz with an Onset Radio Modem powered by six D cell batteries. We use wireless technology to monitor soil moisture and temperature and rainfall in a strip till research plot in North Dakota. The date is transferred wirelessly about four miles where we upload the data to the Internet. We have had difficulty getting the data to transfer through trees that are fully leaved. We resolved the issue by using directional antennas. Our field site antenna is about 15’ above the ground and the base antenna is about 30’ above ground level. We also use 802-11 wireless technology to transfer live video to the Internet. This is the URL for our wireless demonstration site: http://www.ageng.ndsu.nodak.edu/farmmonitor/index.php (Note: The NDSU Dairy AgCam on this wireless demonstration site requires the user to use the Internet browser rather than Firefox or other browsers because it uses ActiveX which is an exclusive Microsoft product. The user’s browser security settings also have to be set to “download unsigned ActiveX controls”. ) I think cellular telephone may be a more reliable technology to use in agriculture but I don’t know of it would work for live video.
Posted on 8/2/2008 3:47 AM




